Method & research
How WorkStyle DISC works
“Current status: pre-validation. The 0–100 numbers are measurement-scale indices, not empirical percentiles. Published norms from another proprietary DISC instrument cannot validly be transplanted onto different items.”
Instrument design
44 items in three formats: 32 Likert statements (8 per dimension, half reverse-keyed), 8 forced-choice blocks (choose one Most and one Least like you) and 4 workplace scenarios.
Mixing normative (Likert) and forced-choice formats follows research showing forced-choice formats reduce uniform response styles and some socially desirable responding, while fully ipsative scores alone distort between-person comparison.
Results
Responses are scored on the server. Respondents receive qualitative developmental feedback only; detailed scoring is available to the assessment administrator for review. Scoring keys are not published, to protect the integrity of responses.
The report prioritises continuous trait scores and uses profile categories only as descriptive shorthand; the categories are not empirically discrete personality types.
Calibration & validation roadmap
Recommended calibration is 200–300 respondents for a first stable reference distribution, ideally 500+ for subgroup work.
Later validation should include internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha / McDonald’s omega), factor and circumplex structure, test–retest stability, convergent validity with established DISC and Big Five measures, and item reweighting if needed.
Research basis
- Brown, A. & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2012). How IRT can solve problems of ipsative data in forced-choice questionnaires (Thurstonian IRT). Behavior Research Methods. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0217-x
- Walton, K. E., Cherkasova, L. & Roberts, R. D. (2020). On the validity of forced choice scores derived from the Thurstonian item response theory model. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191119843585
- Frick, S., Brown, A. & Wetzel, E. (2023). Investigating the normativity of trait estimates from multidimensional forced-choice data. Multivariate Behavioral Research. doi:10.1080/00273171.2021.1938960
- DeYoung, C. G., Weisberg, Y. J., Quilty, L. C. & Peterson, J. B. (2013). Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/jopy.12020
- Abele, A. E. et al. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: agency with competence and assertiveness — communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810
Everything DiSC® publishes its own reliability and validity research. It is mentioned here only as a comparison point: those coefficients validate that proprietary instrument, not this one.